Index funds have become the default investment choice for millions of Americans. Their low fees and simplicity appeal to investors at every level. Financial media often portrays them as the perfect solution for building wealth. Yet beneath this seemingly foolproof investment strategy lie several significant risks that deserve careful consideration.
These funds do provide some real benefits. They offer instant diversification, charge reasonable fees, and require less maintenance. But the dangers of index funds often go unexamined in the rush to embrace passive investing. Understanding these risks helps investors make more informed decisions about their financial future.
This article examines five critical concerns every index fund investor should understand. These aren’t reasons to avoid index funds entirely. They are important factors to weigh when building your investment strategy. Remember, the best diversification includes diversifying investment approaches, not just individual holdings.
1) Increasing market concentration risk
The S&P 500 index appears diverse with its 500 companies. But appearances can be deceiving. The largest companies dominate the index through market-cap weighting. By early 2025, the top ten companies in the S&P 500 made up nearly 40% of the index Magnificent 7 Versus the S&P 500 (2014-2024).
This concentration has grown dramatically. In 1980, the top 10 stocks made up about 20% of the S&P 500. Ten years ago, only 17.4% of the index was concentrated in the top 10 stocks. When you buy an S&P 500 index fund today, nearly four in ten dollars goes to just ten companies.
History shows the dangers of such concentration. The “Nifty Fifty” stocks of the 1970s seemed invincible until they crashed. Japanese stocks dominated global indices in 1989, representing 45% of the world’s market capitalization. They still haven’t recovered to those peaks over three decades later.
Technology companies now dominate index funds even more than energy companies did during the 2008 oil boom. When sector concentration reaches extreme levels, the entire index becomes vulnerable to sector-specific shocks. An index fund investor cannot reduce exposure to overvalued sectors. The fund must maintain its weights regardless of fundamental concerns.
2) Momentum cuts both ways
Index funds create a powerful feedback loop. Money flows into index funds. These funds must buy stocks in proportion to their market cap. The largest companies receive the most investment dollars. Prices rise, and their index weighting increases. They attract even more index fund investment.
This cycle disconnects stock prices from business fundamentals. A company’s stock can rise simply because it’s already large. Tesla’s inclusion in the S&P 500 in December 2020 provides a clear example. Index funds had to buy billions worth of Tesla shares immediately. The stock jumped 70% in the five weeks after the announcement.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller has expressed concern about this phenomenon. “The strength of this country was built on people who watched individual companies. They had opinions about them. All this talk of indexes, it’s a little bit diluting of our intellect. It becomes more of a game,” Shiller said on CNBC’s “Trading Nation.” “It’s a chaotic system.”
Active managers can recognize overvaluation. They can reduce positions or avoid bubble stocks entirely. But index funds lack this flexibility. They must maintain their weights even when valuations reach dangerous levels. This momentum problem represents one of the key dangers of index funds that investors overlook.
3) One-size-fits-none inflexibility
An index fund offers exactly one adjustment lever. You can change how much money you invest. That’s it.
Compare this to a portfolio of 25 individual stocks. Each position becomes a decision point. You can rotate into new opportunities. You can exit stocks with decelerating fundamentals. You can respond to changing market dynamics. There are 25 possible adjustments to optimize your portfolio.
Market conditions change constantly. Interest rates rise and fall. New technologies emerge. Regulations shift. Consumer preferences evolve. Individual stock portfolios can adapt to these changes quickly. An index fund can get left behind.
Consider bank stocks in early 2023. Regional banking stress emerged after Silicon Valley Bank collapsed. An individual stock investor could reduce bank exposure immediately. Index fund investors remained exposed to every bank in the index.
This inflexibility extends to positive opportunities too. When a sector becomes obviously undervalued, individual stock investors can increase exposure. Index fund investors must accept the fixed weightings. They cannot capitalize on clear mispricings.
4) Surrendering voting power
Three investment firms now control enormous voting power in American companies. BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, are the largest voting blocks in nearly 90% of S&P 500 companies. The Big 3 collectively manage approximately US$20 trillion in assets, hold on average more than 20 percent of any given S&P 500 company and cast approximately 25 percent of all votes at the annual meetings of US public companies.
This concentration of voting power raises serious concerns about corporate governance and market competition. Economists have studied whether this “common ownership” reduces competition. Research by José Azar and colleagues found that “ticket prices are approximately 3 to 7 percent higher on the average U.S. airline route than would be the case under separate ownership.” A separate study found that common ownership also has an effect in the banking industry, leading to higher fees on deposit accounts and lower interest rates on savings accounts.
Index fund managers make voting decisions for millions of shareholders. But their incentives may not align with yours. They might support management proposals to maintain status-quo business relationships. They might oppose activist investors who could unlock value.
The government has begun examining this concentration. Senators have introduced legislation that would require any asset manager of a passive index fund with more than 1% of a company’s voting shares to vote those shares in accordance with the instructions of the fund’s investors, not at the discretion of the asset manager. Such changes would fundamentally alter index fund economics. Current investors might face unexpected consequences from future regulatory shifts.
5) Your money, their ethics
The S&P 500 includes companies from every major industry. Some of these companies likely conflict with your personal values. But you cannot exclude them from an index fund. You must own them all.
The index includes tobacco producers, alcohol distributers, cannabis growers, weapons manufacturers, and gambling operations. It contains companies with poor environmental records. It holds firms with questionable labor practices. Your investment dollars support all of them equally.
An individual stock portfolio allows complete customization. You can exclude any company for any reason. You can invest only in businesses you believe in. You can align your investments with your values completely.
Individual stock selection represents one approach to active investing that addresses these limitations. Professional active management offers another path. Both provide tools to customize portfolios according to personal values and market opportunities that index funds simply cannot match.
Conclusion: Consider diversifying your funds
True diversification means more than owning 500 stocks through one index fund. It means diversifying your investment approaches.
Index funds offer broad market exposure at low cost. But they force you to accept concentrated positions, momentum-driven pricing, and zero flexibility. They disconnect you from voting decisions and may conflict with your values. Understanding these dangers of index funds helps you use them more strategically.
The strongest portfolios combine different types of funds and strategies. Index funds might provide your foundation. Individual stocks add flexibility where you need it most. Professional active management brings expertise when markets grow complex. Each approach has its place.
Your investment strategy shouldn’t default to the easiest option. It should reflect your specific goals, values, and circumstances. Sometimes that means index funds. Sometimes it means active management. Often it means both.
Ready to explore if we’re a good fit for your investment needs? Start with our 4-question assessment to begin the conversation.
